YSL released a new line of eyeshadow quads - the Pure Chromatics line.
these palettes are promoted as super pigmented eyeshadows that can be used wet&dry, while foiling them with water will boost the colours to an intense and metallic finish.
they contain 5g of product and cost 47.95€.
the packaging is typical YSL-ugliness (for me at least), trashy and edgy gold plastic packaging, light, thin and very 80ies. no velvet pouch, but very prone to scratches and fingerprints.
it has a full size mirror and contains two applicators, while one is quite uncommon and looks like a rubber spatula on the one side and a pointed rubber applicator on the other end. it's for the wet application of the eyeshadows. i haven't tried such an applicator before and still hesitate to ;)
i find almost all palettes very nicely colour coordinated. although maybe some weird combinations on the first side, i can imagine they layer to fabulous and unusual results and could look amazing in conjunction. i chose the probably most muted, neutral and safe combination, #3. a versatile palette, work-appropriate looks can be done with it as well as more colourful or smokey looks. some will miss a neutral/brow bone highlight shade, but for me it's perfect how it is. i rarely use a brow bone highlighter and would prefer one of my few staples anyway.
the palette #3 contains 4 cool toned shades:
- a shimmery denim blue
- a shimmery icy blue
- a shimmery medium sand taupe with silver sparkles
- a dark brown with maroon shimmer
it didn't irritate my eyes, but used dry i experienced a little bit of fall out and also some product came into my eyes. the finish is shimmery and pearly. i haven't used them wet until now, so i can't speak for that (i still shy away from wetting them, it disturbs the look :P). the staying power is ok, after 6 hours i had a minimal crease-line but nothing too bad. i'll have to experiment with different eyeshadow primers.
YSL Pure Chromatics #3 swatched dry. |
YSL Pure Chromatics #3 swatched wet. |
two different looks with the palette, i always incorporated all shades.
these are my first eyeshadows from this brand, so of course i don't have any comparison to the normal range. where would you place YSL eyeshadows when you'd do a brand comparison?
I'm so glad to read that I'm not the only one finding the YSL packaging tacky!
ReplyDeleteThey are really nice :D But too expensive for me, unfortunately.
ReplyDeleteBtw, as I noticed you're a blush lover, can you just tell me which one of these reminds you the most of NARS's Orgasm? :) I intend to buy one of these as they are well pigmented and shimmery :)
@musing on beauty: the design is so behind the times, isn't it? i'm glad, too that i'm not the only one. i also can't understand why a established luxury cosmetics brand can do such a tacky lipstick tube such as the YSL Rouge Voluptes. i mean, they look cute and kawaii and so cheesy that it's funny again, but i wouldn't associate YSL with kawaii...
ReplyDelete@isaswan: what brand do you need an orgasm dupe of?
Their duo eyeshadows used to be amazing (like 6 years ago LOL), those nowadays are kinda meh... most of the time one color is like the MAC Lustres, lots of fall out glitter. and I don't like the color selection nowadays. however, I need to take a look a the new quads...
ReplyDeleteOh, I am so sorry, I forgot to post a link with pictures :D
ReplyDeleteHere is it:
http://www.fashion-fee.com/2011/02/swatches-kurztest-catrice-defining-duo.html
@trey jones: thank you for your assessment! then i don't think i have to look into this brand any further. maybe i'll get one of the new cream blushes, though.
ReplyDelete@Isaswan: i don't think any of the new catrice blushes is a dupe for orgasm. they have more of a satin finish while orgasm is more shimmery and complex of a strawberry pink with golden sheen & shimmer. but if it has to be this brand, i would try the dark shade of #01 raspberry icecream as a base and the light shimmery shade of #02 peach sorbet layered on top.
Thank you, I'll try it :D
ReplyDelete